Clifford Brunk
Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 23, 2009

I actually took EEB 121 with Professor Brunk, but that wasn't an option on the dropdown menu. He was a pretty easy-going, humorous guy. Exams were fair, although the final is more difficult than the midterm. The book's definitely not necessary, as I never opened mine. Avoid enrolling in David Gold's section if possible. He made it clear that we were not a priority, and wasn't helpful at all. There are 100 points reserved for discussion, and he explicitly told us that discussion was voluntary and he'd assign three assignments throughout the quarter, which would account for the 100 points. He ended up assigning one assignment, and making the final discussion mandatory without informing any of us, except for those who attended regularly. So basically the ones who knew the material were penalized for not attending discussion when he told us NOT to come!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 23, 2009

I actually took EEB 121 with Professor Brunk, but that wasn't an option on the dropdown menu. He was a pretty easy-going, humorous guy. Exams were fair, although the final is more difficult than the midterm. The book's definitely not necessary, as I never opened mine. Avoid enrolling in David Gold's section if possible. He made it clear that we were not a priority, and wasn't helpful at all. There are 100 points reserved for discussion, and he explicitly told us that discussion was voluntary and he'd assign three assignments throughout the quarter, which would account for the 100 points. He ended up assigning one assignment, and making the final discussion mandatory without informing any of us, except for those who attended regularly. So basically the ones who knew the material were penalized for not attending discussion when he told us NOT to come!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!