Amy Richlin
Department of Classics
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

29.4%
24.5%
19.6%
14.7%
9.8%
4.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: B
Feb. 5, 2019

If you are simply interested in this subject and in discussing gender relations, still don't take this class. I am personally not a classics major and it was not a requirement on the class listing that you even have take any kind of lower division classics class, but she certainly expected you to know as much as she does in her 40 years of post-doc. I had just taken a class about ancient gender studies so I was so excited for this class, but Amy Richlin ruined the subject for me. If you didn't know that some random emperor had passed some law in 542 BCE or whatever and failed to include the gravity of the situation in a test answer that had pretty much nothing to do with said random law, she would take points off. Yikes, stay away unless you absolutely have to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: B
Feb. 5, 2019

If you are simply interested in this subject and in discussing gender relations, still don't take this class. I am personally not a classics major and it was not a requirement on the class listing that you even have take any kind of lower division classics class, but she certainly expected you to know as much as she does in her 40 years of post-doc. I had just taken a class about ancient gender studies so I was so excited for this class, but Amy Richlin ruined the subject for me. If you didn't know that some random emperor had passed some law in 542 BCE or whatever and failed to include the gravity of the situation in a test answer that had pretty much nothing to do with said random law, she would take points off. Yikes, stay away unless you absolutely have to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!