- Home
- Search
- Amada Armenta
- PUB AFF 116
AD
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Armenta really cares about her students and takes the time to get to know them and even learn their names, all 130 of them. The weekly assignments are clear and attainable and help you better understand lecture. Both the Professors and TAs are highly responsive to student feedback and I had a great experience.
Professor Armenta was great. She was a really good lecturer, even when the material could be a tad bit boring (most of the time it was actually pretty interesting though). Didn't hate it, didn't love it, but it's required for public affairs and I liked it well enough. I definitely learned a lot about qualitative reasoning, which isn't something most people have ever used before since quantitative methods are always seen as more "scientific." Also shoutout to my TA John for being so awesome.
I really loved this class! Professor Armenta is knowledgable, non intimidating, and helpful. I saw her a couple of times for office hours and she helped me out with my final project. She also didn't grade harshly at all, and discussions were well spent and engaging. I really enjoyed the interview project and how we built on it for transcribing and coding. I did not know what interview coding was before this class, but now I feel confident in it. Note that you do have small almost weekly assignments but they were usually very easy. Professor Armenta also likes to know her students and would memorize things about them that they wrote on notecards on the first day of class. Classes weren't recorded, but she posted the slides and last year's recording on the website.
I loved this class! I don't think lectures were mandatory (I didn't attend), and even if they were I wouldn't mind because Professor Armenta is an engaging lecturer and the class content is interesting.
Shoutout to my TA Arjun for making the class 1000x more interesting. Definitely take it with him if you can!
Professor Armenta makes a compelling case for why we need qualitative literacy to be taught to people as much as quantitative methods is. I really enjoyed this class. I think the work, activities, and topics were very unique and interesting. I would definitely recommend this class to people who aren't public affairs majors.
Professor Armenta is a great lecturer. This class only met once a week and she thoroughly explained any upcoming assignments and I always left class comfortable that I could accurately complete them. The TAs were also very helpful in clearing up any misunderstandings. There is no midterm, the final is a portfolio composed of questions answered through concepts taught throughout the quarter. Her assigned readings are actually very interesting, she goes over them in class but it helps to read them ahead of time. Attendance is taken in section. The only stressful assignment during the quarter was one in which we had to conduct an hour-long interview and then transcribe it word for word. Overall a great upper-division course.
Armenta really cares about her students and takes the time to get to know them and even learn their names, all 130 of them. The weekly assignments are clear and attainable and help you better understand lecture. Both the Professors and TAs are highly responsive to student feedback and I had a great experience.
Professor Armenta was great. She was a really good lecturer, even when the material could be a tad bit boring (most of the time it was actually pretty interesting though). Didn't hate it, didn't love it, but it's required for public affairs and I liked it well enough. I definitely learned a lot about qualitative reasoning, which isn't something most people have ever used before since quantitative methods are always seen as more "scientific." Also shoutout to my TA John for being so awesome.
I really loved this class! Professor Armenta is knowledgable, non intimidating, and helpful. I saw her a couple of times for office hours and she helped me out with my final project. She also didn't grade harshly at all, and discussions were well spent and engaging. I really enjoyed the interview project and how we built on it for transcribing and coding. I did not know what interview coding was before this class, but now I feel confident in it. Note that you do have small almost weekly assignments but they were usually very easy. Professor Armenta also likes to know her students and would memorize things about them that they wrote on notecards on the first day of class. Classes weren't recorded, but she posted the slides and last year's recording on the website.
I loved this class! I don't think lectures were mandatory (I didn't attend), and even if they were I wouldn't mind because Professor Armenta is an engaging lecturer and the class content is interesting.
Shoutout to my TA Arjun for making the class 1000x more interesting. Definitely take it with him if you can!
Professor Armenta makes a compelling case for why we need qualitative literacy to be taught to people as much as quantitative methods is. I really enjoyed this class. I think the work, activities, and topics were very unique and interesting. I would definitely recommend this class to people who aren't public affairs majors.
Professor Armenta is a great lecturer. This class only met once a week and she thoroughly explained any upcoming assignments and I always left class comfortable that I could accurately complete them. The TAs were also very helpful in clearing up any misunderstandings. There is no midterm, the final is a portfolio composed of questions answered through concepts taught throughout the quarter. Her assigned readings are actually very interesting, she goes over them in class but it helps to read them ahead of time. Attendance is taken in section. The only stressful assignment during the quarter was one in which we had to conduct an hour-long interview and then transcribe it word for word. Overall a great upper-division course.
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.