Albion M Urdank
Department of History
AD
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.8%
18.1%
14.5%
10.9%
7.3%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 11, 2007

Boring, monotone lecturer who occasionally attempts jokes unsuccessfully. Lots of reading, but only the Chambers book is crucial. Rest of reading is only needed for discussions (hardly appear on tests). His very extensive, detailed lectures cover everything for the tests and are really a repetition of the Chambers text. By the end of the quarter I realized I could either 1) do ALL the reading and not go to class OR 2) go to class, take excellent notes, and not do the reading. Both methods got me into the A- range each test. Essay Q's are not bad at all for either test or for the paper. MC's can be tricky. I'd say a B+ is easily obtainable (thats what most of my not-hard-working friends got).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 27, 2007

Lecture was boring at the beginning extremely difficult to follow. A little more clear after the midterm. The midterm and final were not cumulative and the readings were pretty interesting, kinda related to sociology, if you're into that sutff.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 11, 2007

Boring, monotone lecturer who occasionally attempts jokes unsuccessfully. Lots of reading, but only the Chambers book is crucial. Rest of reading is only needed for discussions (hardly appear on tests). His very extensive, detailed lectures cover everything for the tests and are really a repetition of the Chambers text. By the end of the quarter I realized I could either 1) do ALL the reading and not go to class OR 2) go to class, take excellent notes, and not do the reading. Both methods got me into the A- range each test. Essay Q's are not bad at all for either test or for the paper. MC's can be tricky. I'd say a B+ is easily obtainable (thats what most of my not-hard-working friends got).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Feb. 27, 2007

Lecture was boring at the beginning extremely difficult to follow. A little more clear after the midterm. The midterm and final were not cumulative and the readings were pretty interesting, kinda related to sociology, if you're into that sutff.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!