Love the man, but what was that final.

*please keep in mind that the people writing these reviews are probably upset about the final*

Grade Breakdown:
Surveys (built in extra credit as long as you do them): 1%
Learning Catalytics (clicker questions used for participation during lecture): 5%
Weekly Mastering Chemistry HW: 5%
PTLs (pre-lecture mini quizzes): 10%
POGILs (weekly discussion worksheet; graded based on completion): 10%
CMCs (actual quizzes; we had three this quarter): 12%
PRWAs (peer-review writing assignments; there were three): 15%
Midterms (there were two; each one is worth 10% with 8% coming from your own performance and 2% coming from a group submission): 20%
Final: 23%

I took this class after taking 14AE with Dr. Casey. I do not have the most extensive chem background (no AP chem), so that's why I chose the enhanced series. I also heard good things about Dr. Courey.

I'll start off by saying that Dr. Courey is a really nice professor. He gave extensions to the whole class when he saw that many of us hadn't turned in one of the PRWAs on the night before it was originally due. He is very approachable and can easily break down concepts for students to better understand. His TAs are also very approachable and helpful. The teaching staff is fair overall.

This class is pretty assignment heavy. It will help solidify the concepts, don't get me wrong. But it is also a lot of time and effort. Take this class if you want to really understand the concepts. Don't take it if you are expecting it to take less time or effort. I think the main difference between 14BE and 14B are that BE has more structured time built into the class for you to practice and solidify material. But if you would rather do it all on your own, don't take this class.

With that being said, the grading in this class is generous in terms of the weight of each assignment. Dr. Courey listens and pays attention to his students. He gave extensions. The final was ridiculously long, so he curved it. That curve was appreciated, but didn't help that much (I went from a 60.8% to a 69% on the final... for reference, my midterm average was an 88.5% without the group portion, so I was pretty upset with the setup of the final). However, he redid the grading scale at the end of the quarter so that there was a wider range of percentages for people to earn an A, A-, etc.

The grade breakdown:
Participation: 5%
Homework: 5%
Discussion Worksheets: 10%
Pre-Lecture Quizzes: 10%
Peer-Reviewed Writing Assignments: 15%
Quizzes: 12%
Midterm 1: 10%
Midterm 2: 10%
Final: 23%
EXTRA CREDIT: Surveys: 1%

As you can probably tell, there were a lot of different types of assignments, meaning this class was a bit heavy on workload. However, those took some pressure off of the midterms and the final, which I appreciated (so it just depends what you'd rather have more weight on).

Participation, homework, discussion worksheets, and pre-lecture quizzes were time consuming, but you should get 100% on all of them if you do them.

The writing assignments were often tedious, as you had to write short essays on different topics that would usually take 3-4 hours (at least for me). However, if you did put the time into them, the prompts were fairly straightforward and your average on the three assignments will probably end up being an A of some sort.

The 3 quizzes (worth 4% each) were on CCLE and were a little tricky. Being open-source (like all exams in this class) definitely helped though, as there were a lot of conceptual questions you'd be able to find on his slides. With enough preparation you could probably score very well on these as they weren't insanely hard though. After the second quiz, however, a lot of the class complained so he made a policy where he'd replace your quiz average with your final grade if that was beneficial to you, so that was pretty nice of him.

The midterms were definitely doable and I'm pretty sure the majority of the class did well on these. 80% of your midterm grades were based on your individual score and the remaining 20% would be based on your group midterm score (same exact exam, just done with your discussion group after the individual attempt).

As the other reviews have already said, the final was really long and difficult. It was not a fair exam at all especially considering the precedent he'd set (with both time and difficulty) on the midterms. I genuinely think this was an accident though; I don't think Courey meant this maliciously at all. Also, I think most of the difficulty stemmed from the exam length itself– the questions were all doable with enough time to think them through and check your work. I know his bruinwalk reviews are tanking because of this exam, but tbh I don't think he's going to administer a final this long again, because he definitely got a lot of backlash for it. He did curve the final by making it out of 88 instead of 100, and he also lowered the grade cutoffs for the class (A became 91, A- 88, B+ 83, B 78, B- 73, etc). Still, I'm not giving him any excuses for the final– it was unfair and even with the curve/cutoffs it tanked a lot of peoples' grades, which really shouldn't have happened in the first place if we were given a final similar to the midterms.

In summary I totally understand where all the negative reviews are coming from, because I was extremely scared for my grade after the final as well. However, Courey really is a kind professor and a great lecturer, so I personally would probably still recommend his class with caution (as I think that difficult final won't be a trend). If you want a more comprehensive understanding of chemistry/have less of a chemistry background like I did, I'd still say take this class over 14B. If you have a strong foundation already, maybe the lower workload of 14B would be more beneficial for you.

Professor Courey is pretty understanding and after the terrible and long final, he made accommodations to the grading of the class which was really nice. At first, he was going to divide the overall final score by 0.88 (which did not do much for those who did not score too high, like me lol) but then he also curved the class and made an A from 91-98, A- from 88-90.9, B+ from 83-97.9, and etc. This was really great to see, but before taking the final, I was at an A and then dropped all the way to 84% which sucked lol. The PRWAs are time-consuming and homework is also quite difficult and takes a while to complete as well.

Honestly, my major complaint would have to be the fact that the final included so much new material. He dedicated a whole FRQ with 6 parts on a topic that we barely covered in the last lecture which was super annoying. The midterms are fairly simple and not too hard to do well on if you study the class material. The CMCs can get tricky with confusing wording. He had LA workshops which were great for diving into the class content more deeply but were not that helpful for studying for the exams.

Be ready to pace yourself on the final exam because that was what honestly screwed everyone up.

I'm honestly shocked by how overwhelmingly positive Courey's reviews are after experiencing this class firsthand. I truly think most of these reviews are a bit biased, seeing as Courey's past exams were online and grades were extremely curved in 2020-2021. As a first-generation student who did not take AP Chem, this class had me absolutely lost and it truly ruined my motivation to pursue biochemistry. I initially was very excited for the topics covered in CHEM 14BE, but the way Courey taught the lectures and responded to all of my questions passive-aggressively, completely burned out my passion. I ended up spending over 40 hours a week studying and completing homework for this dreadful class, just to receive an awful grade after failing the final because I was sick when I took it. (Taking an 8 am chemistry final directly after taking a 24-hour calculus final while having the flu is insanely brutal.) He also offered little to no accommodations when I explained to him that I was ill and immunocompromised with privileges given to me by CAE.

I can't believe that the stupid exam was worth 30% of our grade on top of midterms being 30% and quizzes being a staggering 9%. Especially since we spent so much time working on homework, just for these exams (with very little time to prepare for; AKA 3 days to learn very complex topics) to completely obliterate our grades. I think Courey is a great researcher, but I difficult professor that I do not recommend for people who don't have a very strong background in chemistry.

I would never take this course again, nor would I recommend to any love one. He is the king of not being accommodating. He did not care about any input you had. It was his way or no way!! His extra. credit was worthless. The TA did their best, but the issue was him.

Dr. Courey is a great prof who genuinely cares for his students and wants to see them succeed. I definitely learned a lot in this class and although the material was tough, especially since I hadn't taken AP chem, Dr. Courey provided plenty of resources (extra OHs, CLC worksheets, extra videos) for us to learn. I think Dr. Courey did a great job given this was his first time teaching 14BE and I think he deserves more credit for how much time and effort he put into the class and into teaching us. When reading the rest of the reviews it's important to keep in mind that most people commenting are frustrated with their final exam grade.

TL;DR: I would not recommend this course to anyone. Keep in mind that this review is also for 2022, so there was no insane final like Winter 2021.

Grade distribution:
Weekly homework: 4%
2 peer review writing assignments: 7%
10 POGILs: 8%
iClicker: 3% (65% of lectures had to be attended to get full credit)
Surveys: 1%
12 PTL quizzes: 8% (3 attempts given)
3 CMC quizzes: 9% (1 attempt given)
2 midterms: 30% (1 online due to COVID, 1 in-person)
Final exam: 30%

There was an overwhelming amount of assignments throughout the quarter, individually worth very little credit, yet not negligible. The weekly assignments and PTLs were very time-consuming. The 3 CMCs were very stressful, and only 1 attempt was given for each of these, despite multiple students asking for 2 attempts throughout the entire quarter. The average on the 1st CMC was 14.2/20, 14.3/20 on the 2nd, and 16.4/20 for the last. However, Courey did replace the overall CMC grade with the final exam grade if you did better on the final exam.

The 2 writing assignments were frustrating, as it was unknown what Courey specifically was looking for until it was time to actually peer review. It seemed like he expected in-depth knowledge despite a 500-word limit, which required a lot of time, along with guessing games as to what to focus on in these assignments. Despite the abundance of assignments, the exams were still worth a large portion of the grade, not too much of a safety net compared to 14B.

Since the first 4 weeks of the course were online, we had 1 online midterm, 1 in-person midterm, and 1 in-person final. The online midterm was of much more difficulty than the in-person exams, but that does not detract from the overall fact that all of these exams were difficult. The only saving grace was one of the TAs, who sent out review documents that were very helpful and demonstrated what to focus on for these exams (however, this TA will no longer be at UCLA).

The weekly POGILs were often written to be very lengthy. Outside of the 2-hour discussion sessions, my group would have to meet for a couple of hours most weeks just to finish these.

As for the lectures, he read off the slides (he does provide the slides beforehand, which is useful), although he often skipped over slides. A significant portion of time was given to a few students who asked questions (often straightforward or just repetitions of what he had just said).

Personally, I also did not find Courey to be very accommodating or friendly, unlike some of the other reviews. For example, this is a very small thing, but he would never acknowledge students saying goodbye to him; he'd either just stare at them or just pretend not to hear it, even though others could obviously hear it.

All in all, I would HIGHLY not recommend this course or this professor.

tl;dr: If you aren't comfortable with your study skills, don't take it. It's doable (except for that nasty final that dropped my grade by 6%), but create a schedule to get stuff done and find your support network.

Please note that 2021W was the pilot class, so there might be changes to this class in the future

Easiness: 2/5

I went to a high school that had an AP Chemistry curriculum, so several concepts taught in 14BE were not novel to me. However, each concept builds on each other, so make sure to master the foundations. I struggled with the later concepts largely because I slacked off on learning some earlier concepts.

Workload: 2/5

In any non-midterm/final week, you’ll be expected to complete:

- 1-3 pre-lecture quizzes (along with ppts and videos), with each assignment due before each lecture
- 1 weekly homework assignment
- Learning Catalytics questions during lecture (graded on participation only)
- 1 discussion worksheet, due before next week's discussion

As seen above, the workload for 14BE is largely similar to 14AE's. One major difference is that there are three peer-reviewed essays (aka PRWAs). These assignments are largely straightforward and weighted heavily (40%) on peer evaluations.

Regarding exams, 14BE has three forms of assessments: CMCs, midterms, and the final.
- CMCs: multiple choice tests that ask if you know the basics of concepts. These are not cumulative.
- Midterms are half free response, half multiple choice tests that are also not cumulative and test your application of concepts. 14BE, being a discussion-oriented class, also has group midterms which are worth 20% of your midterm grade.
- The final is a cumulative test like the midterms (I really hope he reworks the final for future classes).

I thought that most of these assessments (except for the final, again) were fair.

I highly recommend that you schedule time to finish this work because when midterms, writing assignments, and finals set in, the content piles up. You will still be assigned content for midterm weeks. I also recommend breaking down work over several days (i.e. reading the ppts first, taking the pre-lecture quiz next, then taking notes during lecture) so that you can digest the content. Go to office hours -- they can be extremely helpful, even if you don't have any specific questions. Find peers and make study groups.

Clarity: 4/5

I felt that Professor Courey is a good lecturer. For me, I generally understood what he was explaining. During lectures, he will read over the slides which he will have posted at the start of the week and solve out Learning Catalytics questions and powerpoint problems. His office hours are also helpful if you are struggling with concepts.

Helpfulness: 4/5

Professor Courey provides office hours throughout the week, and extra office hours before midterms and the final. In addition, he uses Piazza to answer student questions. However, I felt that he expects students to answer Piazza questions first before he adds anything.

One thing I loved about this class were the TAs and LAs, who made this class much more bearable. I found that my TAs’ explanations and suggestions provided a refreshing perspective on the content. Furthermore, the LA workshops are good sources for practice questions. Go visit them when you can.

Overall: 3/5

Would I recommend this class? Yes, but only if you are ready to challenge yourself.

WHAT CAN I SAY ABOUT MY MAN, ALBERT COUREY. ANYONE WHO IS ANYONE NEEDS TO EXPERIENCE THERMODYNAMICS WITH THE LEGEND THAT IS ALBERT COUREY.
I had started with 14A with Lavelle and I remember wondering whether I should switch to Courey or stay with Lavelle for 14B. I strongly encourage taking 14B with Courey. He genuinely cares about teaching us everything from Thermodynamics to Chemical Equilibria. So the course is comprised of:
Midterm I 16%:
So Midterm 1 based on the scheduling will be the midterm that has the least amount of material being tested on so it will be the easiest of the Midterms and the Final.
Midterm II 16%:
Midterm II is covers more material, but for some reason I think this test was easier and everyone did better on than Midterm 1.
Final 32%: Because of the COVID19 crisis, we could opt-in/opt-out of the test and I opted out because I already had the grade I wanted but my friends also said this was a very fair test.
Worksheets 5%: Graded in completion, but I highly recommend studying the format of these as they are just like his tests. Usually, you will get your worksheet and be like "WTF I cannot do this" but that is the point so you work in your discussion section with your LAs and TA. After a while, you'll get the hang of the worksheets and be like "wait WTF am I like lowkey smart??"
Pre-class quizzes 16% : These quizzes had unlimited tries and were online but Courey encouraged us to not use so many tries and actually work on them by offering some extra credit if we completed the quiz in 1-2 tries. The quizzes are also very similar to the tests especially his "Challenge Quizzes" 10/10 recommend finding friends to work on them with because these definitely require group effort for like the Challenge Quizzes.
Participation 5%: Participation was the hardest thing in the class. We had these minute papers due after Fridays lectures and they would open at 2pm and close at 8pm. A lot of people would forget about them and lose these participation points. Then the next way to get participation points was the Cold Call Discussions. Basically you sign up and as long as you sign up you get participation points. The bad part is that signing up makes you available to be called on in class so if Courey has a question he can call your name from a list to answer. You do not have to be right or anything he just wants to have the lecture attentive. But it easily is the most stressful 50 minutes of your life but it will make you attentive in class I must admit.
i>clicker 10%: these iclickers are based on just doing them in class there really is not much about them.

**WARNING: Courey is different than Lavelle in the sense that Courey mainly tests on conceptual rather than calculations. His tests sometimes only used variables instead of chemical compounds so we would be forced to critically analyze the problems in front of us. But lowkey I never thought I was a conceptual person but Courey is such an amazing professor that I understood the concepts. But of course there are people who are better at calculations than conceptual so keep that in mind.

Just wanted to shout out Jason, my LA. Literally a god but i think he is graduating this year. And Jessica Soule, my TA was also pretty good.

IN SUMMARY: COUREY IS THE BEST PROFESSOR EVER