PHILOS 31
Logic, First Course
Description: Lecture, four hours; discussion, one hour. Recommended for students who plan to pursue more advanced studies in logic. Elements of symbolic logic, sentential and quantificational; forms of reasoning and structure of language. P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 5.0
Units: 5.0
AD
AD
Most Helpful Review
Summer 2017 - One of the best teachers at UCLA, with excellent care for students particularly during his discussion sessions and office hours. Because of his quick email responses and clear help, I was able to do very well in the class, ending with a 98% overall. Unfortunately, you need to get 100% in his class to get an A+, but I am not disappointed in any sense. His humor is amazing, and his mind is young; I felt such a connection talking to him and learning about the class, so if you have the chance, take Antti! I want to take Philosophy 132 (next level) but will only do it if he teaches~
Summer 2017 - One of the best teachers at UCLA, with excellent care for students particularly during his discussion sessions and office hours. Because of his quick email responses and clear help, I was able to do very well in the class, ending with a 98% overall. Unfortunately, you need to get 100% in his class to get an A+, but I am not disappointed in any sense. His humor is amazing, and his mind is young; I felt such a connection talking to him and learning about the class, so if you have the chance, take Antti! I want to take Philosophy 132 (next level) but will only do it if he teaches~
Most Helpful Review
Very hard class- I practically lived in Clicc doing the homework and studying for the exams. Yet, it was a fun class- the feeling of satisfaction I felt every time I did a problem correctly was priceless. Prof. Hovda is a good professor, except he goes off on many unrelated tangents and entertains any stupid irrelevant question someone asks.
Very hard class- I practically lived in Clicc doing the homework and studying for the exams. Yet, it was a fun class- the feeling of satisfaction I felt every time I did a problem correctly was priceless. Prof. Hovda is a good professor, except he goes off on many unrelated tangents and entertains any stupid irrelevant question someone asks.