BIOENGR C147
Applied Tissue Engineering: Clinical and Industrial Perspective
Description: Lecture, three hours; discussion, two hours; outside study, seven hours. Requisites: course CM102, Chemistry 20A, 20B, 20L, Life Sciences 7A. Overview of central topics of tissue engineering, with focus on how to build artificial tissues into regulated clinically viable products. Topics include biomaterials selection, cell source, delivery methods, FDA approval processes, and physical/chemical and biological testing. Case studies include skin and artificial skin, bone and cartilage, blood vessels, neurotissue engineering, and liver, kidney, and other organs. Clinical and industrial perspectives of tissue engineering products. Manufacturing constraints, clinical limitations, and regulatory challenges in design and development of tissue-engineering devices. Concurrently scheduled with course C247. Letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
Spring 2017 - This class turned out to not be as bad as I expected when I first signed up for it, but it still has a solid amount of work (take everything seriously). Classes were T/Th from 6-7:40 (he normally ended by about that time), and there was no discussion section despite what the registrar said. For the lecture slides, I printed them out during class. His first 3-4 presentations were disorganized imo, but the organization seemed to improve afterwards. An issue with the class is that he would go off into tangents, which sometimes made it difficult to keep track of what we had to know for the midterm. Also, when we had to do the written assignments, he was not clear with the requirements from the get-go. One class, he told us to do one thing, and in the next class, he added an extra detail/requirement. This is why I recommend going to lecture. That being said, he gives good anecdotes, and I did not find the class boring. Dr. Tawil does have a lot of experience, and he shows videos on tissue engineering, but beware if you faint when you see blood or operations, as some can be graphic. Also, I don't know why he uses Bing. Even though there was a textbook and chapters to read on the syllabus, this is NOT necessary. I don't think anyone actually read the book. Grade breakdown: 20% Article Summary: You pick a scientific article to summarize (the professor approves it beforehand) and you just follow the template he gives you. Easier said than done, though, but if you dedicate one weekend to typing it and another weekend to editing it, you should be fine. It was out of 10 points, and he allowed us to turn in a first draft, which he graded and then gave back to us. If you are below the maximum 10 points, you can edit the summary one more time to get the full grade. 25% Midterm: Given during Week 7. You just had to memorize the slides (but there were a LOT of them). During lecture, it is also important to write down what he says, and if you are a fast writer like me, then hopefully you can jot down the major points he emphasizes (it should be clear what he stresses is important during lecture). Just be sure to pay attention in class. However, the issue with the midterm (all free response, no multiple choice or fill in the blank) is that there were so many details we had to know, and there were so many slides, which made it difficult to keep track of the immense amount of details. Overall, I think the class average was around 82%, and for Tawil, this was lower than he expected. He gave everyone 5 points extra to their test score. When you are writing down your answers for the midterm, do NOT write one long paragraph. Try to itemize your answers, which will make it easier for him to grade and will lower the chances of him missing something correct on your exam. 20% Quizzes and Participation: The quizzes were all open notes and were at the end of a lecture, which is why it is important to pay attention and take notes during lecture, as he quizzes you on things that he includes in the slides AND what he says during lecture. One thing I did NOT like about this class is that we had to read articles before lecture and discuss it as a class. I am just not a fan of that, even though the professor does give good advice with articles in retrospect. Pay attention for this too, since he might ask about controls on some figures during a quiz. There were some miscellaneous assignments that were simple to do as well. 35% Final Term Paper: 40 sources minimum (Does not include websites, and I used only journal articles). He gives a lot of specifications, but again, he does not tell you what he wants from the very beginning (I really hope he fixes this). I dedicated the entire Memorial Day weekend to getting this paper done, which I was able to do, but I spent some days afterwards with edits and re-organizing/re-wording some sections. Take this seriously! You do NOT want to procrastinate on this assignment. I am very glad I didn't. You can email him a first draft and he will tell you what to improve on. There was also an extra credit project where we gave group presentations on a tissue engineered device (our proposals) and the winners got the most extra credit, etc. It was during the last lecture, and it was fun (but it would not have been as good if it was a graded assignment). We did a more informal proposal thing with an article earlier in the quarter, and I enjoyed that too. If Tawil can make ALL article reviews in this format, that would be fantastic! Overall though, I do recommend taking this class. I do not think Tawil is a mean person. He may seem intimidating at first, but he cares about his students and is willing to help. He is very knowledgeable in his field, and he would be even better if he organized his assignment requirements earlier. If you are taking this class, then please take it seriously, and if you do, then this class should not make you tear your hair out. If you have a BE elective that you need to take, then this class would be a wise choice if you are willing to put in the work.
Spring 2017 - This class turned out to not be as bad as I expected when I first signed up for it, but it still has a solid amount of work (take everything seriously). Classes were T/Th from 6-7:40 (he normally ended by about that time), and there was no discussion section despite what the registrar said. For the lecture slides, I printed them out during class. His first 3-4 presentations were disorganized imo, but the organization seemed to improve afterwards. An issue with the class is that he would go off into tangents, which sometimes made it difficult to keep track of what we had to know for the midterm. Also, when we had to do the written assignments, he was not clear with the requirements from the get-go. One class, he told us to do one thing, and in the next class, he added an extra detail/requirement. This is why I recommend going to lecture. That being said, he gives good anecdotes, and I did not find the class boring. Dr. Tawil does have a lot of experience, and he shows videos on tissue engineering, but beware if you faint when you see blood or operations, as some can be graphic. Also, I don't know why he uses Bing. Even though there was a textbook and chapters to read on the syllabus, this is NOT necessary. I don't think anyone actually read the book. Grade breakdown: 20% Article Summary: You pick a scientific article to summarize (the professor approves it beforehand) and you just follow the template he gives you. Easier said than done, though, but if you dedicate one weekend to typing it and another weekend to editing it, you should be fine. It was out of 10 points, and he allowed us to turn in a first draft, which he graded and then gave back to us. If you are below the maximum 10 points, you can edit the summary one more time to get the full grade. 25% Midterm: Given during Week 7. You just had to memorize the slides (but there were a LOT of them). During lecture, it is also important to write down what he says, and if you are a fast writer like me, then hopefully you can jot down the major points he emphasizes (it should be clear what he stresses is important during lecture). Just be sure to pay attention in class. However, the issue with the midterm (all free response, no multiple choice or fill in the blank) is that there were so many details we had to know, and there were so many slides, which made it difficult to keep track of the immense amount of details. Overall, I think the class average was around 82%, and for Tawil, this was lower than he expected. He gave everyone 5 points extra to their test score. When you are writing down your answers for the midterm, do NOT write one long paragraph. Try to itemize your answers, which will make it easier for him to grade and will lower the chances of him missing something correct on your exam. 20% Quizzes and Participation: The quizzes were all open notes and were at the end of a lecture, which is why it is important to pay attention and take notes during lecture, as he quizzes you on things that he includes in the slides AND what he says during lecture. One thing I did NOT like about this class is that we had to read articles before lecture and discuss it as a class. I am just not a fan of that, even though the professor does give good advice with articles in retrospect. Pay attention for this too, since he might ask about controls on some figures during a quiz. There were some miscellaneous assignments that were simple to do as well. 35% Final Term Paper: 40 sources minimum (Does not include websites, and I used only journal articles). He gives a lot of specifications, but again, he does not tell you what he wants from the very beginning (I really hope he fixes this). I dedicated the entire Memorial Day weekend to getting this paper done, which I was able to do, but I spent some days afterwards with edits and re-organizing/re-wording some sections. Take this seriously! You do NOT want to procrastinate on this assignment. I am very glad I didn't. You can email him a first draft and he will tell you what to improve on. There was also an extra credit project where we gave group presentations on a tissue engineered device (our proposals) and the winners got the most extra credit, etc. It was during the last lecture, and it was fun (but it would not have been as good if it was a graded assignment). We did a more informal proposal thing with an article earlier in the quarter, and I enjoyed that too. If Tawil can make ALL article reviews in this format, that would be fantastic! Overall though, I do recommend taking this class. I do not think Tawil is a mean person. He may seem intimidating at first, but he cares about his students and is willing to help. He is very knowledgeable in his field, and he would be even better if he organized his assignment requirements earlier. If you are taking this class, then please take it seriously, and if you do, then this class should not make you tear your hair out. If you have a BE elective that you need to take, then this class would be a wise choice if you are willing to put in the work.
AD
1 of 1
